The critics have different attitudes about the criticisms should be something and it should be oriented. Abigail Solomon-Godeau view schedule that his critics have chosen as one the question is posed: "first of all, the practice of critique-literary or art-should be about posing these questions. That's what I do in my teaching and that is what I try to do in my posts. Of course, there are cases where you can say, ' this is definitely what's going on, ' or ' this is silly, cryptic or dishonesty. ' But from deep in the mind, this is still in place-it means nothing, how it works, we can think about it. "
Kay Larson, who was also interested in the interpretation of the works of art, says that she started writing critique "by dealing directly, if possible with files-drills using the language and remove the block. It's hard and scary-because you always want to make these reviews and opinions, but please wait to do it. Once you experience this, you could try to infer how to interpret it, and there are many ways to solve – through social studies, history, theory, criticism or standard described. "
Grace Glueck viewed the role wedding photography contract of the critic is one of the members who have knowledge of the public about the work of art: she yearns to "information, explain, interpret and unravel." She wanted to "help a reader put art in an allegorical, seeking her birth circumstances, it has been compared to stars in the relationship with the other arts." However, Glueck said outright that she needs "against arbitrary standards, the work of luộm thuộm, a lack of precision, these misconceptions, and support the good works of anyone."
Coleman, in 1975, establishing the premise that he relied on it to write criticism:
A critic should be independent of the artists and celebrities they write about. These articles should appear regularly in a magazine, newspaper, or a public opinion forum. The work is reviewed in the article which should be publicly accessible, and at least a portion of those should be the same age as critics and/or the young artist, little more, with all their diversity. And the critics should be happy to receive freely the attitude of those doubts because it is essential for the criticism seriously.
This is the clear statement of Coleman about the criticisms should be and how it should be oriented. He contested a criticize independent of the artist, the Museum and the exhibition sponsor for the artist. He accurately aware of the conflicts of interests that may occur between critics and artists or critics and sponsors: he doesn't want critics to be the spokesperson for someone, and more than that, there should be an independent voice. Coleman argued that because the criticism is a public activity, so the article's critics should be approached with the readers attention and works of art are being criticized also should be ready to absorb the public's definition. This will probably deter a critic visiting the work of an artist to write about work, because that work only in private.
Coleman distinguishes between the curators and historians writing about art with the critics. He argued that the curators, who collected books and exhibited it in the galleries and museums, and the historian, who put older works into an allegorical, written from the privileged position: it is the privileged of late understandingbut the curators is the power of patronage. Coleman noted that writers, historians, curators, and critics, as those of you who are artists through sponsorship for the works of ho, will have a difficult time is at question. However, he quickly realized that skepticism do not grudge or enemy action. The purpose of Coleman's critics argue, is building, and he adds: "The abuse a critic's role largely arose from the desire for power and the need to be loved."
Mark Stevens, agreed that it should distinguish between written reviews, and writing history: "the sad Act of an art historian is that the slurs that the critics can do better than anyone else, and can only say it is lively, spontaneous, impressedtimely, with the present-in short, critics who roared to per comments in a few moments. "
Lucy Lippard is an independent critics have a different attitude to Coleman, the conception of her critics did not agree with the concept that has just been quoted by Coleman. She referred to the written about his art is "b
